| |
Oct
31
|
 |
A million billion years ago (i.e., October 2007), Philadelphia City Council took time out to demand Roberto Clemente’s number for all teams. That hasn’t happened, of course, and so City Council has decided to weigh in on baseball matters again:
Councilman Jim Kenney’s resolution calls on the league to change its rules to require at least one day game during the playoffs and the World Series. This year’s series World Series games all started around 8:30 p.m. The resolution, approved by Council, said day games would ensure that “youths can share in the excitement of these games and we can preserve the next generation of baseball fans.” The resolution also noted that some games ended after midnight, meaning young fans had to go to bed not knowing the final score.
Ahh, yes, perhaps we can start the games at around 1 or 2 p.m., so our youths can share in the excitement of skipping school to watch the World’s Series!
Photo via Library of Congress
|
|
dmac | 11:57 AM | 0 Comments
|
Jan
24
|
 |
City Council meets for the first time in the post-John Street era today, and it’s already getting ready to do important work.
By important work, of course, I mean City Council members are re-introducing previously-failed bills. Jim Kenney wants to get rid of the requirement one has to live in Philly for a year to apply for a city job. This will be time #3 introducing it for Kenney, but it will only be attempt #2 for Blondell Reynolds Brown’s exciting tour guide regulation bill!
The idea is that if we make tour guides take a history test and get certified, they won’t tell us that Thomas Jefferson invented the light bulb. Plus, city bureaucracy will certainly be streamlined if it has to certify freaking tour guides.
Phila. Council Reintroduces Failed Bills from John Street Era [KYW 1060]
|
|
dmac | 11:08 AM | 1 Comment
|
Jun
15
|
 |
Woohoo! After one week as a “pro-choice city,” Philadelphia is now no longer one, as many of the people who voted for the bill decided it was more important to pander to angry Catholic constituents than stand by their convictions. Hooray!
The city wasn’t declared both a pro-choice and pro-life city, but instead the week-old resolution was simply rescinded. “I’m angry with myself for not abstaining,” said Councilman Jim Kenney, who voted yes last week. “It’s not something I think we should have forced on the public at large.” Or he got a lot of angry phone calls.
Blondell Reynolds Brown, who sponsored the original legislation, clearly got a lot of angry phone calls, too, but told everyone who disagrees with her she’s actually the only one who could possibly be correct: “I have learned as an enlightened pro-choice advocate that there may have been other ways to make my position known.”
Meanwhile, City Council passed over 80 bills, giving almost all of them less debate or discussion than the meaningless repeal of the meaningless resolution. And now they’re on vacation until September! Good work, guys! You earned that summer break!
Council repeals ‘pro-choice city’ resolution [Inquirer]
|
|
dmac | 10:34 AM | 0 Comments
|
Apr
18
|
 |
As the mayor’s race rolls toward its inevitable, boring conclusion, the interested observers are beginning to circle the wagons, talk in wild platitudes and get really nervous Tom Knox is actually going to win this thing.
For example, YoungPhillyPolitics dissects the newest poll, showing Tom Knox with approximately a 750 percentage point lead over the other candidates. City Councilman Jim Kenney even chimed in! “If this poll is true and this trend continues, on May 16th my concience [sic] will be clear.” Thanks, Jim! We were all wondering what your conscience was going to be like in mid-May. Then Kenney wrote about how stupid Philadelphia voters are.
But what about people who actually decide the elections; i.e. old people. Well, they’re getting attention from the mayoral candidates as well. The KYW 1060 article was headlined “Mayoral Hopefuls Promise Better Health Care If Elected,” so you know how much they’re pandering.
But after the AARP-sponsored forum, the attendees got down to more important stuff:
At the end of the forum - a staple at a senior get-together - a raffle. A nice lady is going to the Tropicana.
Buoyed after seeing her excitement, Tom Knox began to hatch a new idea: Free spaghetti dinners are the Trop.
Mayoral Hopefuls Promise Better Health Care If Elected [KYW 1060]
Oh. Crap. [Young Philly Politics]
|
|
dmac | 12:29 PM | 0 Comments
|
Mar
29
|
 |
Say what you will, but I think Councilman Jim Kenney has totally embraced blogging the way it’s supposed to be done. Good show.
What [Comment by James Kenney, YPP]
|
|
dmac | 3:28 PM | 0 Comments
|
Feb
15
|
 |
Yesterday, Jim Kenney rescinded his bills that would eliminate or raise campaign contribution limits in response to angry posts on Young Philly Politics, an Internet petition, phone calls, etc.
Huzzah, I suppose. I know I made fun of him a few times for the bill, but I probably would have made fun of him anyway — after all, he’s a politician. That’s what I do. I make fun of politicians. (Quite a world, eh?) But let’s be fair now: I commend Kenney for debating people online about his bill — even if it’s just for the humor factor — and for changing his mind because of it.
But I guess my question here is: What repercussions would there have been had one of Kenney’s bills passed City Council and raised or eliminated campaign contribution limits? Would there have been any at all? After all, Philadelphians weren’t as angry about the pay raise as the rest of the state. I mean, sure, people were pissed on, say, Young Philly Politics, but would Joe Average in the Far Northeast care?
Oh, forget it, this is getting too close to trying to make an actual point and then I might have to think it through more, defend myself, interview people… forget it. Somebody get me a funny photo, STAT!
Phew. Much better.
What Just Happened [Young Philly Politics]
|
|
dmac | 2:25 PM | 0 Comments
|
Feb
6
|
 |
Jim Kenney continued to unveil his master plan yesterday as he changed his tune and says he will introduce a campaign spending bill than raises campaign donation limits rather than eliminate them.
Last week, Kenney introduced a bill to eliminate campaign contribution limits in response to Tom Knox’s surge in a recent poll. (Knox is planning to spend $15 million of his own money.)
But, still, not everyone is happy. Mayoral candidate Michael Nutter, take it away:
“I can only call and ask my good friend, Councilman Kenney, to take a deep breath, take a chill pill and let this election cycle play out.”
Nutter’s rejected line was: “If you pass this bill, my good friend Councilman Kenney, the voters will say to you: ‘You are the weakest link. Goodbye!’”
But still, the real winner with Kenney’s new bill is not Nutter or Kenney or Brady or even Knox. No, it’s Metro, which ran the above overloaded-sack-of-money stock photo next to the story about Kenney’s new bill. Here’s an idea: Get rid of campaign contributions, but make them only able to be given in giant sacks of overflowing money. (The ‘$’ on the side is optional.)
Kenney’s new idea: Link campaign limits to spending by others [Metro]
Archives: Jim Kenney
|
|
dmac | 1:56 PM | 0 Comments
|
Feb
5
|
 |
Less than a week after Jim Kenney proposed to change the rules to make it easier for Bob Brady to win the mayor’s race, he’s already found his way back into our hearts and minds.
KYW 1060 reports Kenney is seriously interested in rubber sidewalks for our fair city.
(On a side note, the Wikipedia entry for sidewalk is fantastic due to this: “A sidewalk (chiefly North American English), pavement (British English and Philadelphia dialect)…” That there’s a whole entry on the Philly accent — thanks, Bill Labov! — is totally awesome too.)
But back to rubber sidewalks. Oh, man, how awesome would that be. I can only assume rubber sidewalks are sort of the pavement (pronounced ‘pay-ment’) equivalent of flubber, allowing us to hop 50 feet in the air and traverse large distances in a single bound. Forget you, Segway!
Okay, so maybe it doesn’t work like that. Let’s have Councilman Kenney explain:
“It’s a very solid material. Probably harder than a running track. Certainly not a trampoline. Not like the Bud Light commercial, where they’re banging the bottles off the ground.”
Yes, our City Councilman referenced an ad he probably saw during an Eagles game to explain rubber sidewalks to us. Nonetheless, rubber sidewalks last longer than cement, isn’t as slippery and is made from old tires. (Recycling!)
It’s a great idea. Which means as soon as Kenney’s bill ending campaign contribution limits passes, Local 592 would be able to spend as much money as it wants to tell Bob Brady about the so-called “benefits” of rubber sidewalks.
We’ll see ‘em in around 2047.
Councilman Suggests Rubber Sidewalks For Philadelphia [KYW 1060]
Archives: Jim Kenney
|
|
dmac | 10:20 AM | 0 Comments
|
Feb
2
|
 |
If there’s one way to become mayor, it’s certainly by having your supports post “Theme From Ghostbusters” parodies online:
Sing to the Ghostbusters theme…
Can’t limit his cash… he’ll beat your stash. Who ya gonna call? BOB BRADY!
Evans shouldn’t even run, when Brady’s limits are done. Who ya gonna call? BOB BRADY!
You phonies will cry, when the limits die. Who ya gonna call? BOB BRADY!
This will be fun, when the election is done. Who ya gonna call? BOB BRADY!
I ain’t affraid [sic] of no punks!
Not that politicians themselves look any better when they comment themselves online. Jim Kenney on his bill that would repeal campaign contributions:
I called [Fattah] on Wednesday. He was supportive of the proposal then. Brady also. Dwight was not willing to publicly support it, but was not strongly against it. Mike was a no from the get go.
See it was not Brady’s doing. It was my concern. I called them, except Knox, before hand. I have seen the Wizard of Oz and I do have a brain.
My brain tells me that Knox can win and that would be a travesty. [...]
Explain to me what is ethical about using your career earnings based on predatory lending and mortgage forclosures to run for mayor of Philadelphia. You then use the money to package yourself as a product of public housing and a rags to riches success story.
The only question is: When will Bob “Daaaaaa” Brady weigh in?
MAYOR BOB BRADY! Unemployed: EVANS [YPP]
Where We Are (Comment) [YPP]
Jan. 23: Bob Brady: Da Da Da
|
|
dmac | 3:08 PM | 0 Comments
|
|
|