Mar1 |
‘Inquirer’ Unaware If We Were Still Interested In What Rick Santorum Had To Say, We Would Have Voted For Him
Hey journalism kids! Did you find it funny when Mary-Kate Olsen had a column in the New York Times Magazine? Or how about Angelina Jolie’s piece in the Washington Post? Well, it’s about to get better: The Inquirer is in conversations to hire Rick Santorum as a columnist! Yes, that’s right. In a move sure to piss off Internet bloggers and newspaper writers who’d like to be elevated to columnist status, Inky publisher Brian Tierney and Rick Santorum (at right, palming an invisible basketball) are in negotiations for what Tierney calls “nothing more than blue-sky, guys kicking around ideas.” If it happened, and Santorum sounds more optimistic than Tierney (really?), it’d be a once-a-month thing, and it’d be, uh, quite a coup for the Inquirer, who are apparently also looking at John Fucking Grisham to write a column. (Dean Koontz was unavailable.) Phillymag’s Jason Fagone writes:
Oh, man. I’m really torn here. Actually, no I’m not. It’d be a hell of a name for the paper to get, and think of the fun I could have mocking it. Shit, it’d be like Christmas every time Santorum penned some screed against secular humanists or radical Islam or what it’s like to live in Virginia. Breaking: Santorum to Pen Inky Column? [Phillymag] |
||
|
|




It makes sense from a business standpoint. There was a time when columnists were the stars of newspapers. But that was before other media, radio first and tv second, took newspapers superstars and made them their own (Ed Sullivan, Walter Winchell come to mind). Now newspapers must take electronic media personalities and bring them on board. It makes sense for everyone on board. I’ll just be happy to see the weekly comments from Santorum that will validate why he shouldn’t hold public office. It will be nice to get Santorum-rage again.