|
Just when you thought the Terrell Owens saga was finally over, a new challenger enters the fray and mucks everything up once again. (Why wasn’t there this much debate when Tampa Bay did the same thing to Keyshawn Johnson a few years back? But I digress.)
Anywho, none other than Sen. Arlen Specter, who I think was in Congress with Henry Clay, said yesterday that the Eagles may have violated antitrust regulations by not allowing Terrell Owens to play for the team anymore.
Legal experts the Inquirer talked to said, uhh, no, but hey, Arlen Specter’s wacky theories have been proven right before. Not that the Eagles aren’t being really vindictive. (Cowboys owner Jerry Jones said on a radio show that T.O. is a player he might like to have on his team, and the Eagles filed a complaint saying that was tampering.)
The whole situation is just kind of ridiculous, as you’ve probably all guessed by now. At this point, it wouldn’t be surprising if the Eagles ran the table and won the Super Bowl on a last second Hail Mary pass that bounced off a defensive back’s helmet, off a wide receiver’s foot, through a referee’s hat, off a bird (perhaps an eagle) that was flying by the play and into the arms of Billy McMullen for the game-winning touchdown. Man, that’d rock.
Sparks from Specter in the T.O. case [Inky]
|